Opened 7 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#23 closed enhancement (fixed)
Use Doxygen-style comments
| Reported by: | uwe | Owned by: | somebody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | Cosmetic fixes |
| Component: | coreboot | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Dependencies: | ||
| Patch Status: | there is no patch |
Description
We should probably use Doxygen-style comments to document (at least) the core API/code of LinuxBIOS.
Simple example:
/**
* Description of the function.
*
* @param First input parameter description
* @param Second input parameter description
* @return Return value description
*/
function foo(int x, int y) {
return 0;
}
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 in reply to: ↑ description ; follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 7 years ago by stepan
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 7 years ago by uwe
Replying to stepan:
We should probably use Doxygen-style comments to document (at least) the core API/code of LinuxBIOS.
This documentation is automatically available at:
http://qa.linuxbios.org/docs/doxygen.php
It does not cover the romcc compiled parts though. Should we bother?
No, probably not. But I was referring to actually documenting the code. I know that the doxygen output is already available, but as there's very few comments (and none which have doxygen-syntax) the doxygen output is only of limited use.
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by uwe
- Patch Status set to there is no patch
- version v2 deleted
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by stepan
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
This is part of the documentation chapter of the coding guidelines. No changes to the ticket in a year, and it seems to be a place holder. Closing it for now.

This documentation is automatically available at:
http://qa.linuxbios.org/docs/doxygen.php
It does not cover the romcc compiled parts though. Should we bother?